Cessna Citation Mustang Very Light Jet (VLJ)

October 12, 2008

An inside look at Cessna’s Citation Mustang. Take a quick tour of Cessna’s introductory jet with Glenn Pew. Some may refer to the Citation Mustang as a very light jet or “VLJ.”

Duration : 0:3:56


Comments

25 Responses to “Cessna Citation Mustang Very Light Jet (VLJ)”

  1. salemcripple on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    2.6 mil.? Can’t you …
    2.6 mil.? Can’t you get a much bigger private jet for that. A used one perhaps?

  2. USSCessna on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Sexy Jet.
    Sexy Jet.

  3. ironmantriathalon on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    i agree with you – …
    i agree with you – but solar wont work for a plane until its in the air – the problem is how to get it in the air if it is using an environmentally friendly fuel.

  4. jpowell180 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    “Old junk that …
    “Old junk that didn’t work”??
    The Mustang works just FINE.
    I doubt anyone interested in an VLJ would really care to have a solar-powered electric prop plane!

  5. freddytuber on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    That’s exactly what …
    That’s exactly what is wrong this country! Futuristic turbines? What’s up with that garbage? If it is not electric and solar it’s NOT futuristic at all; it’s plain and simple more of the old junk that didn’t work. 747s are now beeing grounded because of fuel consumption – how futuristic is that!

  6. FadeOp on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    It doesn’t. It’s …
    It doesn’t. It’s certified for single pilot operation, but it’s always nice to have another pilot along to help lighten the workload.

  7. FadeOp on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Nope, this aircraft …
    Nope, this aircraft is certified for single pilot operation.

  8. willthekill3285 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Does tis plane …
    Does tis plane really need a co pilot.

  9. noem1977 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    why this little …
    why this little plane need co-pilot?

  10. Shawkeet on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Best choice of the …
    Best choice of the twin engine very light jets! The Mustang is a clean sheet design with no “oh ” after thoughts added on. These people know how to build a light jet, any flavor you like.

  11. JJ600RR on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    pretty roomy plane …
    pretty roomy plane for its size. if those big thighs fit.

  12. Bmants on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Are those peephole …
    Are those peephole or windows for the passengers?

  13. groundsman on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    i would be happy to …
    i would be happy to own my own 172… citation is just in my dreams!

  14. Treldman on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    It’s actually very …
    It’s actually very slow for a jet plane. Only 392MPH

  15. thiagocessna on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    this is an …
    this is an execellent airplane

  16. twistor96 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    yup ; )
    yup ; )

  17. RexBanner1980 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    Just a tad more …
    Just a tad more expensive though eh? 😉

  18. twistor96 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    If you want a fast …
    If you want a fast jet, get the Citation X.

  19. RexBanner1980 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    My friend Kevin’s …
    My friend Kevin’s dad has one of these. Rich !

  20. TRS717 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    No, you don’t HAVE …
    No, you don’t HAVE to use a GPU. It’ll happily start under it’s own power.

  21. drummerdude6485 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    One word…


    One word…

    SWEET!!!!!

  22. slav209 on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    they are not that …
    they are not that fast small engines’ and every time they need to start one up it needs a gpu. sucks if you have inportant people trying to leave.

  23. 1niceguyme on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    how fast can it go> …
    how fast can it go>????

  24. beatchildproductions on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    I want one it!
    I want one it!

  25. gerritbot on October 12th, 2008 7:20 am

    nice. when’s …
    nice. when’s christmas again?

Got something to say?